%s1 / %s2
 
NEDERLANDS  |  ENGLISH
  • economie
  • iran
  • e-voting
  • 9/11
  • media
  • irak
  • nieuws
  • lees
  • nieuwsarchief
  • van deepjournal
1 juli 2008   |     mail dit artikel   |     print   |    |  Spinwatch
Iran Casus Belli: The Ultimate Spin
By Sam Gardiner
Generate a casus belli.  Fabricate a situation that causes war.  Make it look as if it were the Iranians.  It’s the ultimate spin. 

In an article released on Sunday by Seymour Hersh in the New Yorker Magazine, we learned the White House has met, considered and is probably working to fabricate a situation that could be used by the United States as a pretext for attacking Iran.  

Hersh tells us of a brainstorming session in the Vice President’s office.  The topic of the session was casus belli.  How can we get the Iranians to do something that will make it appear as if they started it, as if they were the bad guys?  

Based upon the article and what we have seen from other sources, it seems to me it’s possible to unravel the strategy probably discussed at that meeting.  What’s the US do?  How could a war with Iran be fabricated?

On the surface, the expanded US covert operations against Iran seem like pin pricks.  The US is training and supporting at least four Iranian minority groups to conduct attacks against targets inside Iran.  Soldiers of the Revolutionary Guard have been killed.  Soldiers and police have been kidnapped.  A cultural center was bombed.  An air base in Tehran was struck.  All are relatively minor incidents.  

I see a pattern, however, that goes back over 20 years.  It’s a pattern the United States seems to favor for starting wars.

The pattern can be seen with the US backed Contras in the 1980’s.  The "military objective" was to strike from bases in Honduras into Sandinista controlled Nicaragua and seize and hold territory.  The policy objective was to use this base to establish a provisional government and serve as a potential beachhead for overt operations.  First do covert operations, to be followed by overt operations.

Before the invasion of Iraq, a covert operation called the Anabasis Project had a similar thread.  Although the plan was not executed, the CIA-formed and trained Scorpions 77 Alpha group was to seize a beachhead in Iraq, take control of the base at Nukhaib near the Saudi border.  Saddam would feel compelled to send troops to retake the base.  He would violate the no-fly zone, and the United States would have a reason to launch Gulf II.  Again, the "military objective" was to seize a beachhead to serve as the base of overt operations, create a casus belli.

The Government of Iran is not going to fall as a result of the of the four minority groups operating inside Iran with US supported activities.  However, as suggested by Hersh, if the Iranians attack one of the groups attempting to gain their “freedom,” the United States could come to their rescue.  We would have a casus belli.

I can hear the President words.  “I have said from the beginning we support the people of Iran, and we respect their culture.”

Thinking about the strategy discussion at the Vice President’s meeting, I can hear someone saying this general approach is fine, but it is not adequate.  We may not have time for all of the covert stuff to work out before the end of the Administration.

Okay, there are alternatives.  There are a couple of faster paths.  

The United States has Special Operations personnel with a very short chain of command to the White House.  Another possibility would be to have them attack a “high value target” that would cause an Iranian response that would justify a US attack.  No congressional approval is needed for this kind of operation.

President Ahmadinejad is known for his vitriolic off-the-chart rhetoric.  He does not very often go off the charts with specifics.  Last week he began telling foreign and Iranian press that when he visited Iraq in March the United States had planned to assassinate him.  He says varying his schedule at the last minute saved his life.  Maybe he was to be the path to a casus belli.

Finally, from the Hersh article, the White House seems to have concluded that the threatening maneuvers by Iranian speedboats in January in the Gulf could be just the thing.  If the Iranians do it again, it could be a casus belli.

The Congress approved $400 million for covert operations against Iran.  With those operations and other options available to the White House, we need to be prepared for the ultimate spin, the casus belli spin.
____________________________________________________________________________

DeepJournal
Meld je aan voor de gratis mailing list.
5 februari 2012  |  
Strijd tegen Damascus en Teheran bedreigt belangen Rusland en China
Iedereen in dit conflict - Iran, de VS en het Westen, Israël, China, Rusland, maar ook de soennitische bevolkingen en hun leiders in de regio - hebben grote belangen die onderling sterk verschillen. Dat maakt de kwestie tot een kruitvat. Daarin wordt naar het zich laat aan zien door Israël en/of de VS een lont gestoken en een lucifer bij gehouden.
30 januari 2012  |  
Voorbereidingen voor een oorlog tegen Iran in volle gang
De nieuwsberichten rond Iran volgen elkaar in rap tempo op en vormen bij elkaar een nieuwe stap in de richting van een militair conflict. De ontwikkelingen gaan snel; een overzicht.
22 januari 2012  |  
Geheime Navo-wapenleveranties aan opstandelingen Syrië om Iran te verzwakken
De oorlog tegen Iran is een langlopend project dat vele jaren van voorbereiding vergt en het doel steeds meer nadert. Deel van de voorbereiding is het in het geheim bewapenen van Syrische opstandelingen. Een verzwakking van Syrië is een verzwakking van Iran.
18 januari 2012  |  
Israël en VS: Iran werkt niet aan een kernwapen
Terwijl de wereld de indruk krijgt dat een oorlog met Iran weer enkele stappen dichterbij is gekomen, doen de vertegenwoordigers van Israël en de VS opvallende uitspraken over de islamitische republiek. De uitspraken zijn mede opvallend omdat tegelijk de opbouw voor een militair conflict onverminderd lijkt door te gaan.
14 december 2011  |  
Albert Spits: Exit voor euro medio 2012
Ik denk dat het voor Nederland ongeveer tussen de 9 en pakweg 15 miljard gaat kosten om weer terug te gaan naar de gulden. Je kunt de euro nog wel behouden, maar als rekeneenheid, een soort handelsmunt. Maar niet als een fysieke munt, daar zitten veel te veel weeffouten in.
Contact - About - Donate - RSS Feeds - Copyright © 2006 DeepJournal, All rights reserved