%s1 / %s2
 
NEDERLANDS  |  ENGLISH
  • economy
  • iran
  • e-voting
  • 9/11
  • media
  • top stories
  • read
  • news archive
  • by deepjournal
1 July 2008  |     mail this article   |     print   |    |  Spinwatch
Iran Casus Belli: The Ultimate Spin
By Sam Gardiner
Generate a casus belli.  Fabricate a situation that causes war.  Make it look as if it were the Iranians.  It’s the ultimate spin. 

In an article released on Sunday by Seymour Hersh in the New Yorker Magazine, we learned the White House has met, considered and is probably working to fabricate a situation that could be used by the United States as a pretext for attacking Iran.  

Hersh tells us of a brainstorming session in the Vice President’s office.  The topic of the session was casus belli.  How can we get the Iranians to do something that will make it appear as if they started it, as if they were the bad guys?  

Based upon the article and what we have seen from other sources, it seems to me it’s possible to unravel the strategy probably discussed at that meeting.  What’s the US do?  How could a war with Iran be fabricated?

On the surface, the expanded US covert operations against Iran seem like pin pricks.  The US is training and supporting at least four Iranian minority groups to conduct attacks against targets inside Iran.  Soldiers of the Revolutionary Guard have been killed.  Soldiers and police have been kidnapped.  A cultural center was bombed.  An air base in Tehran was struck.  All are relatively minor incidents.  

I see a pattern, however, that goes back over 20 years.  It’s a pattern the United States seems to favor for starting wars.

The pattern can be seen with the US backed Contras in the 1980’s.  The "military objective" was to strike from bases in Honduras into Sandinista controlled Nicaragua and seize and hold territory.  The policy objective was to use this base to establish a provisional government and serve as a potential beachhead for overt operations.  First do covert operations, to be followed by overt operations.

Before the invasion of Iraq, a covert operation called the Anabasis Project had a similar thread.  Although the plan was not executed, the CIA-formed and trained Scorpions 77 Alpha group was to seize a beachhead in Iraq, take control of the base at Nukhaib near the Saudi border.  Saddam would feel compelled to send troops to retake the base.  He would violate the no-fly zone, and the United States would have a reason to launch Gulf II.  Again, the "military objective" was to seize a beachhead to serve as the base of overt operations, create a casus belli.

The Government of Iran is not going to fall as a result of the of the four minority groups operating inside Iran with US supported activities.  However, as suggested by Hersh, if the Iranians attack one of the groups attempting to gain their “freedom,” the United States could come to their rescue.  We would have a casus belli.

I can hear the President words.  “I have said from the beginning we support the people of Iran, and we respect their culture.”

Thinking about the strategy discussion at the Vice President’s meeting, I can hear someone saying this general approach is fine, but it is not adequate.  We may not have time for all of the covert stuff to work out before the end of the Administration.

Okay, there are alternatives.  There are a couple of faster paths.  

The United States has Special Operations personnel with a very short chain of command to the White House.  Another possibility would be to have them attack a “high value target” that would cause an Iranian response that would justify a US attack.  No congressional approval is needed for this kind of operation.

President Ahmadinejad is known for his vitriolic off-the-chart rhetoric.  He does not very often go off the charts with specifics.  Last week he began telling foreign and Iranian press that when he visited Iraq in March the United States had planned to assassinate him.  He says varying his schedule at the last minute saved his life.  Maybe he was to be the path to a casus belli.

Finally, from the Hersh article, the White House seems to have concluded that the threatening maneuvers by Iranian speedboats in January in the Gulf could be just the thing.  If the Iranians do it again, it could be a casus belli.

The Congress approved $400 million for covert operations against Iran.  With those operations and other options available to the White House, we need to be prepared for the ultimate spin, the casus belli spin.
____________________________________________________________________________

DeepJournal
Sign up for the free mailing list.
6 February 2010  |  
WHO plays dubious role in Swine flu pandemic
On June 11, 2009 Margaret Chan, the Director-General of the WHO, declared the Swine Flu a pandemic. The declaration of phase six means that emergency procedures are put into motion which bypass established systems designed to safeguard the public health. The result of this is described in part six of this DeepJournal series on the Swine Flu. Conclusion: the vaccine is being tested while being administered to the public. The definition of what a pandemic is, is therefore of great import.
1 February 2010  |  
Government flu advisors not independent
Ab Osterhaus is playing an important role in the affair surrounding the Swine Flu. Through his influence and conflicts of interest, he personifies a system that is now being subjected to investigation from all directions. Soon the investigators will undoubtedly stumble upon SAGE, the strategic advisory group of vaccine and immunity experts for the World Health Organization, or WHO. Osterhaus turns up here as well - he is an expert with SAGE.
31 January 2010  |  
Influence of industry on 'fake pandemic' investigated
Also beyond The Netherlands the question is being raised over whether the large-scale acquisition of vaccines made sense. The Council of Europe began an investigation into this question last Tuesday. 'A number of members of the Council of Europe have expressed exceptionally harsh criticism of the World Health Organization and are asking themselves out loud whether drug manufacturers had too much influence in this decision'.
26 December 2009  |  
How Dutch Minister Klink decided on vaccines with additives - 2
The Netherlands has an ongoing contract with Solvay Pharmaceuticals for the making of vaccines without additives. Then Dutch Health Minister Klink severs - with all of its accompanying financial consequences - the contract with Solvay. He signs new, secretive contracts with GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis, companies that make vaccines with additives - the so-called adjuvants. In The Netherlands everyone is receiving the same vaccine containing adjuvants - whether they are young or old, pregnant or not. What happened that caused Klink to make this decision?
19 December 2009  |  
How Dutch Minister Klink decided on vaccines with additives - 1
In the international battle against Swine Flu different countries use different vaccines to protect their citizens. In the Netherlands vaccines containing additives are being used. Even women 13 weeks pregnant are receiving this vaccine. In arriving at his decision, Dutch Health Minister Klink sought advice from the Health Council of The Netherlands. But he didn't get this advice. And yet he still went ahead and made a decision. Who advised him on this?
Contact - About - Donate - RSS Feeds - Copyright © 2006 DeepJournal, All rights reserved