%s1 / %s2
 
NEDERLANDS  |  ENGLISH
  • economy
  • iran
  • e-voting
  • 9/11
  • media
  • top stories
  • read
  • news archive
  • by deepjournal
1 July 2008  |     mail this article   |     print   |    |  Spinwatch
Iran Casus Belli: The Ultimate Spin
By Sam Gardiner
Generate a casus belli.  Fabricate a situation that causes war.  Make it look as if it were the Iranians.  It’s the ultimate spin. 

In an article released on Sunday by Seymour Hersh in the New Yorker Magazine, we learned the White House has met, considered and is probably working to fabricate a situation that could be used by the United States as a pretext for attacking Iran.  

Hersh tells us of a brainstorming session in the Vice President’s office.  The topic of the session was casus belli.  How can we get the Iranians to do something that will make it appear as if they started it, as if they were the bad guys?  

Based upon the article and what we have seen from other sources, it seems to me it’s possible to unravel the strategy probably discussed at that meeting.  What’s the US do?  How could a war with Iran be fabricated?

On the surface, the expanded US covert operations against Iran seem like pin pricks.  The US is training and supporting at least four Iranian minority groups to conduct attacks against targets inside Iran.  Soldiers of the Revolutionary Guard have been killed.  Soldiers and police have been kidnapped.  A cultural center was bombed.  An air base in Tehran was struck.  All are relatively minor incidents.  

I see a pattern, however, that goes back over 20 years.  It’s a pattern the United States seems to favor for starting wars.

The pattern can be seen with the US backed Contras in the 1980’s.  The "military objective" was to strike from bases in Honduras into Sandinista controlled Nicaragua and seize and hold territory.  The policy objective was to use this base to establish a provisional government and serve as a potential beachhead for overt operations.  First do covert operations, to be followed by overt operations.

Before the invasion of Iraq, a covert operation called the Anabasis Project had a similar thread.  Although the plan was not executed, the CIA-formed and trained Scorpions 77 Alpha group was to seize a beachhead in Iraq, take control of the base at Nukhaib near the Saudi border.  Saddam would feel compelled to send troops to retake the base.  He would violate the no-fly zone, and the United States would have a reason to launch Gulf II.  Again, the "military objective" was to seize a beachhead to serve as the base of overt operations, create a casus belli.

The Government of Iran is not going to fall as a result of the of the four minority groups operating inside Iran with US supported activities.  However, as suggested by Hersh, if the Iranians attack one of the groups attempting to gain their “freedom,” the United States could come to their rescue.  We would have a casus belli.

I can hear the President words.  “I have said from the beginning we support the people of Iran, and we respect their culture.”

Thinking about the strategy discussion at the Vice President’s meeting, I can hear someone saying this general approach is fine, but it is not adequate.  We may not have time for all of the covert stuff to work out before the end of the Administration.

Okay, there are alternatives.  There are a couple of faster paths.  

The United States has Special Operations personnel with a very short chain of command to the White House.  Another possibility would be to have them attack a “high value target” that would cause an Iranian response that would justify a US attack.  No congressional approval is needed for this kind of operation.

President Ahmadinejad is known for his vitriolic off-the-chart rhetoric.  He does not very often go off the charts with specifics.  Last week he began telling foreign and Iranian press that when he visited Iraq in March the United States had planned to assassinate him.  He says varying his schedule at the last minute saved his life.  Maybe he was to be the path to a casus belli.

Finally, from the Hersh article, the White House seems to have concluded that the threatening maneuvers by Iranian speedboats in January in the Gulf could be just the thing.  If the Iranians do it again, it could be a casus belli.

The Congress approved $400 million for covert operations against Iran.  With those operations and other options available to the White House, we need to be prepared for the ultimate spin, the casus belli spin.
____________________________________________________________________________

DeepJournal
Sign up for the free mailing list.
1 February 2012  |  
Preparations for a war against Iran in full gear
News reports on Iran are now following each other in rapid succession, and together they form a new step towards a military conflict. [...] What follows is an analysis of these fast-moving developments
25 January 2012  |  
NATO and CIA covertly arming Syrian rebels in order to weaken Iran
It is clear that all the pieces are being put into place for a war against Iran. It is a long-term project demanding many years worth of preparation, and the ultimate goal is getting closer all the time. One component of this preparation is the covert arming of Syrian rebels.
21 January 2012  |  
Israel and the U.S.: Iran not working on a nuclear weapon
While the world is getting the impression that a war with Iran has drawn a few steps closer, representatives of Israel and the U.S. are making some remarkable statements about the Islamic Republic. These statements are remarkable in part because, at the same time, the build-up to a military confrontation would seem to be continuing apace.
14 December 2011  |  
Economist Albert Spits: the euro is gone by the summer of 2012
De Wit: No, but it’s going to cost an awful lot of money to reprint all of those currencies and make the switch.
Spits: Sure, but it’s going to cost a lot more money to try and save the euro, which cannot be saved.
12 December 2011  |  
Government has to be more open, transparent and accountable: Marietje Schaake (D66)
[...] proactive thinking on the part of those operating inside the ruling establishment can nevertheless be a positive thing. This is exactly what Marietje Schaake, European Member of Parliament for the Dutch political party D66, contributes in her article [...]. I ask het what she means by going from being the governed to being the governors'.
Contact - About - Donate - RSS Feeds - Copyright © 2006 DeepJournal, All rights reserved