|
NEDERLANDS | ENGLISH
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 February 2009 |
 mail this article
|
 print
|  | Star Telegram
Pentagon weapons buyer says F-35 [JSF] cost overruns were inevitable
By Bob Cox
The Pentagon’s top weapons buyer says the huge cost increases and delays incurred on the F-35 joint strike fighter program were inevitable because the Defense Department didn’t spend enough money upfront to build realistic prototypes.
In a recent memo, John Young, undersecretary of defense for weapons acquisition and development, said the failure to build true prototypes led Pentagon planners and the Lockheed Martin-led contractor team to come up with unrealistic cost and weight estimates. The F-35 "leads the way in all recent cost-growth analyses" of Pentagon weapons programs, Young said in the memo to Defense Secretary Robert Gates, reported Tuesday by Inside Defense. The most recent public cost estimate of the F-35 program, prepared in late 2007, is that it will cost the Pentagon $298 billion (in 2001 dollars) to develop and buy 2,400 aircraft for the Air Force, Navy and Marines, up from an initial estimate of $229 billion, according to Young’s memo. New estimates, expected to be released soon, are expected to show further cost growth. Young and Gates have both said recently that the Pentagon needs to spend early to develop prototypes of weapons systems so the technical difficulties and likely costs are understood. For the JSF program, the Pentagon contracted with Boeing and Lockheed to build "technology demonstrators" and not "true prototypes." As a result, Young said, "the future of JSF cost growth was largely written in 2001 when budget and pricing decisions were made . . . based on inadequate knowledge gained from the JSF technology demonstrators."
____________________________________________________________________________
DeepJournal Sign up for the free mailing list. |
|
2 May 2010 |
CIA Seeks to Influence Opinion on Wars - 3
The first group of people to be targeted in a military conflict is the public. They are the first victims, for in a military conflict war is only one stage of the battle. The biggest battle is for the hearts and minds of the public at large.
2 April 2010 |
CIA Seeks to Influence Opinion on Wars - 2
The CIA Red Cell recommendations for influencing the European public into continuing their support for the mission in Afghanistan was quite remarkable. But the reality is that the contents of the document prove the rule, not the exception. From my book The Next War - The Attack on Iran - A Preview I took some excerpts that show that the CIA document is not quite unique
31 March 2010 |
CIA Seeks to Influence Opinion on Wars - 1
What's special about the case of the document is not so much its content, but the fact that it is now available for all to see. In a military conflict, war is only one stage of the struggle. The biggest struggle is for the hearts and minds of the public at large.
23 March 2010 |
Obama continues Bush's Iran policy - 3
'America's Pro-Israel Lobby', as AIPAC calls itself, holds the biggest conference in its history today, yesterday and the day before in Washington. 'This year, the lobby has built its annual conference, and its entire lobbying agenda around the issue of Iran', writes Haaretz. AIPAC is very influential, and Washington fears the long arm of the lobby. One of the resources it employs is the Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence (TFI).
20 March 2010 |
Obama continues Bush's Iran policy - 2
The battle against Iran has already begun. War is only one phase of this process - just as it was with Iraq. The preparation is the most important part of the battle. Whoever thought that the preparation for war ended when Barack Obama took office is advised to take note of the views of critical thinker Noam Chomsky in the previous installment of this DeepJournal series. He says that Obama's policy on Iran is a continuation of the policy of his predecessor, President Bush. Anyone who cares to look at the facts will see that he is right.
|