Power-downs in WTC prior to attack

19 September 2006 |

mail this article |

print |

Power-downs in WTC prior to attack

Watch the video

There were power-downs in the WTC following the completion of a several years long project led by the brother and the nephew of George W. Bush to remodel the security system of the towers.

Professor David Ray Griffin writes about this in his bookThe New Pearl Harbor and says in an interview: '[...] this company Securacom, that was in charge of security for the World Trade Center, one of its principals in the preceding years, when the new security system was put in, was Marvin Bush, the president's brother. And then Wirt Walker III, perhaps even more important, was the CEO, and his tenure existed up through 9/11. So there's no mystery how people could have gotten access.

Furthermore, we have reports from people in the World Trade Center, that in the days and weeks preceding 9/11, certain parts of the building were closed off, during which irt was said repairs were being made, and engineers going in and out, and the power was down so all security cams were off, and so forth. So this is not a mystery how this could have been done.'

Read more about Stratesec, formerly known as Securacom, in this Dutch article by DaanSpeak from september 11th 2004. There it is said that Stratesec also provided security for two other companies that had a vital role that day: Dulles airport (flight 77) and United Airlines (flights 93 and 175).

____________________________________________________________________________

DeepJournal
Sign up for the free mailing list.

2 May 2010 |

CIA Seeks to Influence Opinion on Wars - 3

The first group of people to be targeted in a military conflict is the public. They are the first victims, for in a military conflict war is only one stage of the battle. The biggest battle is for the hearts and minds of the public at large.

2 April 2010 |

CIA Seeks to Influence Opinion on Wars - 2

The CIA Red Cell recommendations for influencing the European public into continuing their support for the mission in Afghanistan was quite remarkable. But the reality is that the contents of the document prove the rule, not the exception. From my book The Next War - The Attack on Iran - A Preview I took some excerpts that show that the CIA document is not quite unique

31 March 2010 |

CIA Seeks to Influence Opinion on Wars - 1

What's special about the case of the document is not so much its content, but the fact that it is now available for all to see. In a military conflict, war is only one stage of the struggle. The biggest struggle is for the hearts and minds of the public at large.

23 March 2010 |

Obama continues Bush's Iran policy - 3

'America's Pro-Israel Lobby', as AIPAC calls itself, holds the biggest conference in its history today, yesterday and the day before in Washington. 'This year, the lobby has built its annual conference, and its entire lobbying agenda around the issue of Iran', writes Haaretz. AIPAC is very influential, and Washington fears the long arm of the lobby. One of the resources it employs is the Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence (TFI).

20 March 2010 |

Obama continues Bush's Iran policy - 2

The battle against Iran has already begun. War is only one phase of this process - just as it was with Iraq. The preparation is the most important part of the battle. Whoever thought that the preparation for war ended when Barack Obama took office is advised to take note of the views of critical thinker Noam Chomsky in the previous installment of this DeepJournal series. He says that Obama's policy on Iran is a continuation of the policy of his predecessor, President Bush. Anyone who cares to look at the facts will see that he is right.