|
NEDERLANDS | ENGLISH
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 March 2009 |
 mail this article
|
 print
|  | Reuters
Obama seeks Russian help on Iran but denies deal
Related article: 'Turkey to be US-Iranian go-between'
Related article: Turkish president leaves for Iran to ease tension between Iran, US.
Related article: Russia seems open to discussing US plan on Iran.
Related article: Syria president Assad meets Saudi FM in Damascus. Related article: Iran's leader says Obama following Bush's path. Related article: Iran to launch first atom power plant in summer. Related article: As recession saps demand, a world awash in oil. Related article: US, other powers urge Iran to curb nuke program. -
By Ross Colvin and Caren Bohan President Barack Obama said on Tuesday he wanted to work with Russia to resolve a nuclear stand-off with Iran but denied reports he had offered to slow deployment of a missile defense shield in exchange for Moscow's help.
The New York Times reported that Obama had sent a letter to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev suggesting he would back off deploying a system in eastern Europe to intercept and destroy missiles, a move Russia sees as a military threat, if Moscow helped stop Iran from developing long-range weapons.
"What I said in the letter is what I have said publicly, which is that the missile defense that we have talked about deploying is directed toward, not Russia, but Iran," Obama said after meeting British Prime Minister Gordon Brown.
"And what I said ... was that, obviously, to the extent that we are lessening Iran's commitment to nuclear weapons, then that reduces the pressure for, or the need for a missile defense system," he said.
Obama's defense secretary, Robert Gates, said Washington wanted to reopen dialogue with Moscow on Iran. There were two options, he said -- to work together to persuade Iran not to go ahead with their ballistic missile program, or make Russia a "full partner" in the defense shield. White House spokesman Robert Gibbs stressed the linkage between the missile shield and Iran at a White House briefing.
"If working with our allies and working with Russia we can eliminate the threat, then you eliminate the driving force behind that system to combat that threat,".
Moscow, which plans to start up a nuclear reactor at Iran's Bushehr plant by the end of the year, has used its veto in the United Nations Security Council on a number of occasions to water down or defeat U.S.-led efforts to impose tougher sanctions on Iran.
The Obama administration has said it wants to "reset" U.S.-Russian ties, which deteriorated under former U.S. President George W. Bush and then Russian President Vladimir Putin, partly because of the plans to deploy the shield.
MOSCOW WILLING TO TALK Putin's successor, Medvedev, told a news conference that Moscow was willing to talk to Washington about the shield but that it saw Iran's nuclear program as a separate issue.
"If the new (U.S.) administration shows common sense and offers a new (missile defense) structure which would satisfy European (needs) ... and would be acceptable for us, we are ready to discuss it," Medvedev said on a visit to Madrid.
"If we are talking about any 'swaps' (Iran for missile defense) this is not how the question is being put. This would not be productive," he said.
U.S. officials have said the United States will go ahead with the planned deployment of the missile shield in eastern Europe, but only if it is shown to work and is cost-effective.
The plan to site missiles and a radar tracking station in former Communist satellite states Poland and the Czech Republic has angered Moscow, which sees it as a threat, despite U.S. insistence that it is aimed at rogue missiles from Iran.
The United States and some European nations fear Iran is trying to build atomic weapons and are concerned at its development of ballistic rockets that could be used to carry any nuclear warheads great distances.
Tehran insists its pursuit of a nuclear capability is purely for the peaceful generation of electricity. Obama has said he is prepared to offer Iran economic incentives if it abandons its nuclear program but he has also warned of tougher economic sanctions if it pushes ahead.
The United States and five other powers, Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China, said on Tuesday they were committed to direct talks with Iran, a switch from Bush's policy of trying to isolate the Islamic Republic.
On Capitol Hill, a key Republican said Obama should consider engaging Iran more directly. "Among other steps, the possibility of establishing a U.S. visa office or some similar diplomatic presence in Iran should be on the table," said Indiana Senator Richard Lugar, the ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
(Additional reporting by Jason Webb in Madrid, David Morgan in Washington and Mark Heinrich in Vienna; Editing by David Storey)
____________________________________________________________________________
DeepJournal Sign up for the free mailing list. |
|
1 February 2012 |
Preparations for a war against Iran in full gear
News reports on Iran are now following each other in rapid succession, and together they form a new step towards a military conflict. [...] What follows is an analysis of these fast-moving developments
25 January 2012 |
NATO and CIA covertly arming Syrian rebels in order to weaken Iran
It is clear that all the pieces are being put into place for a war against Iran. It is a long-term project demanding many years worth of preparation, and the ultimate goal is getting closer all the time. One component of this preparation is the covert arming of Syrian rebels.
21 January 2012 |
Israel and the U.S.: Iran not working on a nuclear weapon
While the world is getting the impression that a war with Iran has drawn a few steps closer, representatives of Israel and the U.S. are making some remarkable statements about the Islamic Republic. These statements are remarkable in part because, at the same time, the build-up to a military confrontation would seem to be continuing apace.
14 December 2011 |
Economist Albert Spits: the euro is gone by the summer of 2012
De Wit: No, but it’s going to cost an awful lot of money to reprint all of those currencies and make the switch.
Spits: Sure, but it’s going to cost a lot more money to try and save the euro, which cannot be saved.
12 December 2011 |
Government has to be more open, transparent and accountable: Marietje Schaake (D66)
[...] proactive thinking on the part of those operating inside the ruling establishment can nevertheless be a positive thing. This is exactly what Marietje Schaake, European Member of Parliament for the Dutch political party D66, contributes in her article [...]. I ask het what she means by going from being the governed to being the governors'.
|