|
NEDERLANDS | ENGLISH
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 December 2006 |
 mail this article
|
 print
| 
David Lynch asks disturbing questions about 9/11
Watch the video
Director David Lynch asks disturbing questions on Dutch national television about what happend on 9/11. Watch the video:
Lynch, who today was the central guest on Wereldgasten (World Guests), Nederland 3, 20.20 hrs, showed a clip from the 9/11 documentary Loose Change that talked about the flight recorders of the planes hitting the WTC which were not found (according to the official commission report) but were discovered, three out of four, by a fireman leading FBI agents through the rubble (according to the testimony of the fireman). After showing the clip Lynch summed up the most poignant question surrounding 9/11. One of his most disturbing questions was the matter of the missing footage of the crash into the Pentagon, which was taken away by the FBI. On the question asked by the interviewer whether the U.S. government might have been involved in the attacks on September 11th, he answered that that was too big to think about.
The documentary Loose Change, 2nd Edition is available on DVD in the Netherlands with Dutch subtitles and a 20 minute introduction from and interviews by Daan de Wit from DeepJournal. Watch De Wit being interviewed on Dutch tv about 9/11 and the question why the main stream media for so long have not picked up on it.
In the interview Lynch stated: [...] Things [...] that bother me, is the hole in the Pentagon being too small for a plane, the lawn isn't messed up, and the government's not showing the plane hitting when many cameras photographed it. At the World Trade Center, three buildings came down, like demolitions, and two of them were hit by a plane, but the third one they said: 'Do you want us to pull it?' and they pulled it and it looked just like the other two. Those things bother me. In Pennsylvania, the plane that went down, there was just a hole in the ground, there wasn't any wreckage, there wasn't any skid marks, there wasn't any tear in the earth, and no one has ever really found out about that. So every place there's questions, coming from this documentary. You don't have to believe everything in the documentary to still have questions come up. And you look back and you remember what you saw and what you were told, and now, you have questions. It's just an event that has many questions and no answers.'
____________________________________________________________________________
DeepJournal Sign up for the free mailing list. |
|
6 February 2010 |
WHO plays dubious role in Swine flu pandemic
On June 11, 2009 Margaret Chan, the Director-General of the WHO, declared the Swine Flu a pandemic. The declaration of phase six means that emergency procedures are put into motion which bypass established systems designed to safeguard the public health. The result of this is described in part six of this DeepJournal series on the Swine Flu. Conclusion: the vaccine is being tested while being administered to the public. The definition of what a pandemic is, is therefore of great import.
1 February 2010 |
Government flu advisors not independent
Ab Osterhaus is playing an important role in the affair surrounding the Swine Flu. Through his influence and conflicts of interest, he personifies a system that is now being subjected to investigation from all directions. Soon the investigators will undoubtedly stumble upon SAGE, the strategic advisory group of vaccine and immunity experts for the World Health Organization, or WHO. Osterhaus turns up here as well - he is an expert with SAGE.
31 January 2010 |
Influence of industry on 'fake pandemic' investigated
Also beyond The Netherlands the question is being raised over whether the large-scale acquisition of vaccines made sense. The Council of Europe began an investigation into this question last Tuesday. 'A number of members of the Council of Europe have expressed exceptionally harsh criticism of the World Health Organization and are asking themselves out loud whether drug manufacturers had too much influence in this decision'.
26 December 2009 |
How Dutch Minister Klink decided on vaccines with additives - 2
The Netherlands has an ongoing contract with Solvay Pharmaceuticals for the making of vaccines without additives. Then Dutch Health Minister Klink severs - with all of its accompanying financial consequences - the contract with Solvay. He signs new, secretive contracts with GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis, companies that make vaccines with additives - the so-called adjuvants. In The Netherlands everyone is receiving the same vaccine containing adjuvants - whether they are young or old, pregnant or not. What happened that caused Klink to make this decision?
19 December 2009 |
How Dutch Minister Klink decided on vaccines with additives - 1
In the international battle against Swine Flu different countries use different vaccines to protect their citizens. In the Netherlands vaccines containing additives are being used. Even women 13 weeks pregnant are receiving this vaccine. In arriving at his decision, Dutch Health Minister Klink sought advice from the Health Council of The Netherlands. But he didn't get this advice. And yet he still went ahead and made a decision. Who advised him on this?
|