%s1 / %s2
 
NEDERLANDS  |  ENGLISH
  • economy
  • iran
  • e-voting
  • 9/11
  • media
  • top stories
  • read
  • news archive
  • by deepjournal
14 April 2006  |     mail this article   |     print   |   
Avian flu: Worldwide catastrophe or 'fearmongering'?
Placing the avian flu virus under the microscope

By Daan de Wit
Are we on the threshold of a worldwide avian flu pandemic? The man in charge of coordinating the WHO's response to the avian flu, Dr. David Nabarro, is
anticipating the potential for between 5 and 150 million victims. Meanwhile the medical correspondent for Radio Noordholland is calling the media coverage of the avian flu 'fearmongering' and speaks to his patients and listeners of 'macro-economic interests'. Virologist Ab Osterhaus disagrees with him; he is advising the Dutch authorities to take extensive antiviral measures, something which the government is now following up on. And then there is Professor Jorge Hirsch, who has written at length and in detail on the coming war with Iran. In the avian flu he sees a motive for an attack on Iran.

On CNN's In the Money Jack Cafferty took a look at the economic side of the issue: 'It's hard to tell how much the bird flu coverage is hyped these days and how much is really worth worrying about. But companies have to prepare for the worst even if it never happens because if a pandemic comes and the work flow stops, business suffers. And if the supplies and services run dry, you and I are going to suffer too.' The Dutch central bank also examined the issue and 'does not rule out a decline of at least 5 percentage points [PDF] in GDP' in the event of a flu pandemic, reports Nu.nl. But news about the avian flu remains inconclusive. Not everyone feels it to be a forgone conclusion that avian flu is such a huge threat.

Bush considers change in legislation:
Broader role for army in case of avian flu
Bush is taking the threat of avian flu very seriously: 'Bush seeks military option on bird flu - Suggests troops should be sent in if outbreak occurs', reads the headline in The Boston Globe. '''The translation of this is martial law in the United States"', says Dr. Irwin Redlener, associate dean of Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health and director of its National Center for Disaster Preparedness.

CNN reports: 'Gene Healy, a senior editor at the conservative Cato Institute, said Bush would risk undermining "a fundamental principle of American law" by tinkering with the [Posse Comitatus] act [: banning the military from participating in police-type activity], which does not hinder the military's ability to respond to a crisis. "What it [the Posse Comitatus Act] does is set a high bar for the use of federal troops in a policing role," he wrote in a commentary on the group's Web site. "That reflects America's traditional distrust of using standing armies to enforce order at home, a distrust that's well-justified." [...] Bush began discussing the possibility of changing the law banning the military from participating in police-type activity last month, in the aftermath of the government's sluggish response to civil unrest following Hurricane Katrina.' The Washington Post reports: 'The president said some governors object to the idea of federal control of state National Guard units in emergencies. He added that, as a former governor, "I understand that. . . . But Congress needs to take a look at circumstances that may need to vest the capacity of the president to move beyond that debate. And one such catastrophe or one such challenge could be an avian flu outbreak."'

It is not the first time that Bush has brought up the subject. He also mentioned it after the Katrina debacle, reports the AP: 'President Bush's push to give the military a bigger role in responding to major disasters like Hurricane Katrina could lead to a loosening of legal limits on the use of federal troops on U.S. soil. [...] Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is reviewing a wide range of possible changes in the way the military could be used in domestic emergencies, spokesman Lawrence Di Rita said Friday. He said these included possible changes in the relationship between federal and state military authorities. [...] Di Rita said Rumsfeld has not made recommendations to Bush, but among the issues he is examining is the viability of the Posse Comitatus Act.' Republican U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, a doctor and a Texan, says: '"I believe it is the President hyping this and Rumsfeld, but it has to be in combination with the people being fearful enough that they will accept the man on the white horse. My first reaction going from my political and medical background is that it's way overly hyped and to think that they have gone this far with it, without a single case in the whole country and they're willing to change the law and turn it into a military state? That is unbelievable! They're determined to have martial law."'

'Donald Rumsfeld makes $5m killing on bird flu drug'
The head of the Pentagon is Donald Rumsfeld. He is a shareholder in Gilead-Roche, which produces Tamiflu, a popular antiviral drug. Rumsfeld was once chairman of Gilead. Former American Secretary of State George Schultz is an advisor to Gilead's current Board of Directors and is at the same time serving as the director of Bechtel. Serving on Gilead's Board is former European Commissioner and chairman of the Bilderberg Group Etienne Davignon. '"I don't know of any biotech company that's so politically well-connected," says analyst Andrew McDonald of Think Equity Partners in San Francisco', reports Fortune. 'The prospect of a bird flu outbreak may be panicking people around the globe, but it's proving to be very good news for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and other politically connected investors in Gilead Sciences, the California biotech company that owns the rights to Tamiflu, the influenza remedy that's now the most-sought after drug in the world. [... Rumsfeld] still holds a Gilead stake valued at between $5 million and $25 million [...]', according to Fortune. 'Roche expects 2005 sales for Tamiflu to be about $1 billion, compared with $258 million in 2004.' CNN reports: '[...] the Senate added $4 billion to a Pentagon spending bill to head off the threat of an outbreak of avian flu among humans. The bulk of the money -- $3 billion -- would be used to stockpile Tamiflu [...]'. In May of last year the Dutch Press Agency ANP reported: 'In the second half of this year the company will open a factory in the U.S. in order to satisfy American demand. The explosion in demand for Tamiflu followed the World Health Organization's warning at the end of last year of an outbreak of avian flu'. The headline in The Independent reads: 'Donald Rumsfeld makes $5m killing on bird flu drug'.

Tamiflu useless - Natural product 99% effective
'Doctor says bird flu drug is ‘useless'', reads the headline in The Sunday Times: 'Dr Nguyen Tuong Van runs the intensive care unit at the Centre for Tropical Diseases in Hanoi and has treated 41 victims of H5N1. Van followed World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines and gave her patients Tamiflu, but concluded it had no effect. [...] “Tamiflu is really only meant for treating ordinary type A flu. It was not designed to combat H5N1 . . . (Tamiflu) is useless [1].”' Something that may well be effective is Sambucol, reports the magazine Ode: 'New research, carried out by Retroscreen Virology has indicated that Sambucol®, a patented formula, may fight the virulent Avian Flu virus.' Laboratory tests have shown that the drug is 'at least 99% effective against the Avian Flu virus H5N1.' It also withstood a placebo test with patients. Sambucol is derived from black elderberries.

Avian flu as a means to a hidden goal
Bush's use of dire situations such as September 11th and the avian flu to promote his own agenda is giving some people cause to take a closer look. Several different scenarios have been foreseen in which Avian flu could be used to achieve a secret goal. The website PrisonPlanet by Alex Jones, a producer of documentary films and radio shows (known for his interviews with Charlie Sheen regarding September 11th), points to Exercise Hawthorn, a drill in England involving an outbreak of Avian flu that suddenly turns real. This phenomenon in which drills suddenly become real was seen on September 11th, 2001 and again last year during the attacks in London. The exercises can be arranged right out in the open because once discovered, they remain just an exercise. And when afterwards the exercise suddenly goes live, the blame is placed on the enemy. It is still unknown what the exact circumstances are behind Exercise Hawthorn going live, but given the attacks in the U.S. and London, PrisonPlanet considers it suspicious.

Another example of the use of avian flu as a way to achieve a hidden goal was illustrated in mid-March by Professor Jorge Hirsch of the University of California. He anticipates that the U.S. and Israel will want to attack Iran, and in the absence of a direct provocation, they will build on their existing 'fearmongering' by accusing Iran of producing the avian flu virus. Hirsch points to a Canadian military intelligence report that says that avian flu could be used as a biological weapon. Because the U.S. has not yet publicly pointed this out, Hirsch believes that this argument will eventually be made in the form of a media blitz, in which he would not be surprised to hear claims that sound like this line from a press release that he made up: 'Iranian ecologists are currently at work in the Iranian wetlands to deploy the mutated virus among wild ducks, swans, and geese, in preparation for the launching of the birds along their migratory paths toward the Western world in early April.' Hirsch: 'Does that sound like a good enough casus belli to you? It does to me.'

Yesterday the Associated Press reported: '[..] the H5N1 virus also could arrive in the U.S. through a smuggled chicken or duck, an infected traveler, black-market trade in exotic birds or even an act of bioterrorism, but it says the most likely carrier will be a migrating wild bird.'

Medical correspondent: Fearmongering
Dr. Marten Japenga is the medical correspondent for Radio Noordholland, 'the most listened-to informative radio station [...] in the province [of North Holland]'. On March 15th Japenga advised his listeners: 'Don't panic'. At the same time avian flu is continuing to make world headlines on a daily basis, and The Netherlands is stocking up on 16 million vaccinations, enough for most of it's citizens. In an interview [MP3, 3 Mb, in Dutch] with DeepJournal, Japenga followed up on statements he made on the radio by saying that in the most extreme scenario up to two thousand victims could succumb to the avian flu in The Netherlands, where over one thousand people already die annually from the ordinary flu. He calls the great attention to the avian flu 'fearmongering' and points to the huge financial interests that surround the production of the well-known flu drug Tamiflu: 'And then you make a drug of sorts that offers a risk reduction, a drug that is not a remedy, but reduces the chance that you would contract the fatal variant in a worst case scenario. The likelihood that you would get really sick would be to some extent - it's unclear to what extent - reduced.' He is skeptical about the purchasing policy of the Dutch Minister of Health and suspects that his skeptical attitude is shared by 'an awful lot of pharmacists and doctors'. The whole situation reminds him of the Cold War, 'and I would speculate that there are specific individuals who would surely be able to take advantage of this'.

Japenga: 'This also suits our impression of this era. In the past there were epidemics that really did cost millions of lives, and that was back when health care wasn't the best. Now health care is a modern religion. [...] These days people believe that anything can be cured, that everything should be kept under control, and that any threat should be nipped in the bud. I think that that's an illusion. [... This has to do with] a reliance on medical answers. A virologist plays into this as well. He implies that he has this invisible danger within his sights and that he can keep people well-informed, and I think this leaves a lot of room for criticism.'

Virologist Osterhaus: take pandemic into account
The virologist most often cited in The Netherlands is Ab Osterhaus, head of the Department of Virology at the Erasmus Medical Center. Osterhaus is an advisor to the government, which has now reserved the production capacity necessary for sixteen million flu vaccinations at the factory of Solvay Pharmaceuticals. Osterhaus in an interview [MP3, 5 Mb] with DeepJournal: 'There is no reason for panic.' According to Osterhaus, in the case of a pandemic The Netherlands should be prepared for thousands, if not tens of thousands, of victims. Stocking up on doses of antiviral medication is another form of preparation, just as you could prepare for an earthquake, given that they do occur from time to time. He sees nothing in the opinion of Dr. Stafan Lanka of Germany, who says in an interview: 'Neither in people, nor in blood or other bodily fluids, nor in animals, nor in plants have structures ever been observed or proven to be the avian flu virus or the influenza virus, or anything that could be considered to be a pathogen.' Japenga: 'I'm no expert, I've never seen it [the avian flu virus] either'. The Associated Press reported yesterday: 'Government officials say there’s no known case of virus being passed from a wild bird to a person and no one knows whether wild bird-to-person transmission is possible.' In another article with the headline Top scientist tries to calm bird flu fears, the press agency quotes: '“It is entirely conceivable that this virus is inherently programmed that it will never be able to go efficiently from human to human,” Fauci said.'

____________________________________________________________________________

DeepJournal
Sign up for the free mailing list.
12 September 2013  |  
Why is Syria under attack? - Part 4
When you peek below the surface, it becomes clear that Syria is under attack due to the interests of the parties involved. ‘Syria’ is about power, money, influence and energy.
10 September 2013  |  
Why is Syria under attack? - 3
8 September 2013  |  
Why is Syria under attack? - Part 2
In the event of major military conflicts that risk considerable humanitarian and economic consequences, it is useful to examine the interests of all parties involved as well as the role that the media plays in reporting the events.
7 September 2013  |  
Why is Syria under attack? - Part 1
On the surface it’s straightforward: the U.S. wants to liberate Syria from a brutal dictator who is attacking his own people with poison gas. But beneath the surface there is something very different going on.
28 August 2012
Daan de Wit (DeepJournal) interviewt Webster Tarpley op het Magneetfestival
Het Magneetfestival gaat de diepte in met vier interviews. Daan de Wit interviewt Webster Tarpley, Albert Spits, en Mike Donkers.
Contact - About - Donate - RSS Feeds - Copyright © 2006 DeepJournal, All rights reserved