%s1 / %s2
 
NEDERLANDS  |  ENGLISH
  • economy
  • iran
  • e-voting
  • 9/11
  • media
  • top stories
  • read
  • news archive
  • by deepjournal
5 November 2006  |     mail this article   |     print   |   
This article is part of the series: Iraq-US-connection
1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 ]
The case against Saddam in perspective
Part 2
Part 1
-
By Daan de Wit
The Saddam trial that today resulted in a death sentence has received fierce criticiscm:
  'Amnesty described their trial as [...] “deeply flawed and unfair”. [...] Malcolm Smart, director of the Middle East and North Africa program [said:] “In practice, it has been a shabby affair, marred by serious flaws that call into question the capacity of the tribunal, as currently established, to administer justice fairly, in conformity with international standards''', writes News.com.au today.
Human Rights Watch: '"The court has relied so heavily on anonymous witnesses that it has undercut the defendants' right to confront witnesses against them and effectively test their evidence." Ramsey Clark -- and other attorneys for Hussein and his co-defendants -- have repeatedly denounced the fairness of the Dujail proceeding."It's impossible to have a fair trial where you don't protect all the participants in a trial," Clark has said', writes CNN.
-
Three of Saddams lawyers have been murdered.
-
Without the West, no Saddam, DeepJournal wrote earlier.
-
Saddam was captured after his country was invaded on a premise that proved to be false, namely that he had connections with Al Qaeda and that his country posessed weapons of mass destruction. See this DeepJournal article.
-
War against Saddam unjustifiable, says Human Rights Watch, DeepJournal wrote two years ago.
-
Saddam was captured by the Kurds and then handed over to the U.S., DeepJournal wrote earlier.
-
Saddam is being held accountable (but not yet tried for) the massacre in Halabja, yet a Pentagon report blames Iran for this atrocity.
-
Former dictator Saddam has received the death sentence, but the West is befriended with Mr. Karimov, the leader of Uzbekistan, a country known for its extreme torture.
____________________________________________________________________________

DeepJournal
Sign up for the free mailing list.
18 March 2010  |  
Obama continues Bush's Iran policy
Also under President Obama Iran continues to dominate the world agenda. Iran is being presented as a crucial problem that must be solved. The Iran Problem is one with several layers. The uppermost layer is that Iran is a potential threat to world peace. What are the facts and the fiction that make up this first layer?
6 February 2010  |  
WHO plays dubious role in Swine flu pandemic
On June 11, 2009 Margaret Chan, the Director-General of the WHO, declared the Swine Flu a pandemic. The declaration of phase six means that emergency procedures are put into motion which bypass established systems designed to safeguard the public health. The result of this is described in part six of this DeepJournal series on the Swine Flu. Conclusion: the vaccine is being tested while being administered to the public. The definition of what a pandemic is, is therefore of great import.
1 February 2010  |  
Government flu advisors not independent
Ab Osterhaus is playing an important role in the affair surrounding the Swine Flu. Through his influence and conflicts of interest, he personifies a system that is now being subjected to investigation from all directions. Soon the investigators will undoubtedly stumble upon SAGE, the strategic advisory group of vaccine and immunity experts for the World Health Organization, or WHO. Osterhaus turns up here as well - he is an expert with SAGE.
31 January 2010  |  
Influence of industry on 'fake pandemic' investigated
Also beyond The Netherlands the question is being raised over whether the large-scale acquisition of vaccines made sense. The Council of Europe began an investigation into this question last Tuesday. 'A number of members of the Council of Europe have expressed exceptionally harsh criticism of the World Health Organization and are asking themselves out loud whether drug manufacturers had too much influence in this decision'.
26 December 2009  |  
How Dutch Minister Klink decided on vaccines with additives - 2
The Netherlands has an ongoing contract with Solvay Pharmaceuticals for the making of vaccines without additives. Then Dutch Health Minister Klink severs - with all of its accompanying financial consequences - the contract with Solvay. He signs new, secretive contracts with GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis, companies that make vaccines with additives - the so-called adjuvants. In The Netherlands everyone is receiving the same vaccine containing adjuvants - whether they are young or old, pregnant or not. What happened that caused Klink to make this decision?
Contact - About - Donate - RSS Feeds - Copyright © 2006 DeepJournal, All rights reserved