This article is part of the series: E-voting
[ 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 ]

Stemfraude Verkiezingen VS 2000 - deel 5

Door Daan de Wit
Hoe je het ook wendt of keert: Gore zou de Amerikaanse presidentverkiezingen hebben gewonnen als er eerlijk was geteld. Dat staat te lezen in een ongewoon hard artikel van MSNBC. De Volkskrant kopt daarentegen vandaag, weggemoffeld in een klein artikeltje op pagina 4: 'Bush lijkt terecht president VS'. In ons voorlaatste deel van deze serie, gepubliceerd op 231001, vertelden we hoe de powers that be de einduitslag van de hertelling wisten op te schorten. Vandaag is definitief de waarheid bekend: '[...] it put the wrong man in the White House', aldus de laatste zin van het MSNBC-artikel van Eric Alterman met de titel 'Buried truth of a flawed election'.

Niet alleen de Volkskrant giert uit de bocht met haar berichtgeving over deze zaak, ook CNN slaat een flater: '(The award for most egregious misrepresentation goes to CNN.com for its headline that the results “showed George Bush winning even with a statewide recount.” It showed nothing of the sort.)' 'As the Associated Press report put it, “In the review of all the state’s disputed ballots, Gore edged ahead under all six scenarios for counting all undervotes and overvotes statewide.” In other words, he got more votes than George Bush. Gore won under a strict-counting scenario and he won under a loose-counting scenario. He won if you count “hanging chads” and he won if you counted a “dimpled chad.” He won if you counted a dimpled chad only in the presence of another dimpled chad on the same ballot — the so-called “Palm Beach” standard. He even won if you counted only a fully-punched chad. He won if you counted partially filled oval on an optical scan and he won if you counted only a fully-filled optical scan. He won if you fairly counted the absentee ballots. No matter how you count it, if everyone who legally voted in Florida had had a chance to see their vote matter, Al Gore would be sitting in the Oval Office today.'

Hoe zou de wereld er nu hebben uitgezien, met Gore aan het roer van de VS? Misschien is dat ook de vraag geweest die vooraf ging aan de diefstal van het presidentschap door Bush. Want met Gore waren we misschien niet in de huidige bloeddorstige oorlogssituatie beland. Wat zou Gore hebben gedaan met alle voorkennis en aanwijzingen? Zou hij de aanslag hebben voorkomen? Hoe zou hij hebben gereageerd als de aanslag toch had plaatsgevonden? Zou Gore bereid zijn geweest de voordelen te zien en te nemen van een wereldwijde oorlog?* Voordelen op het gebied van het afkalven van de democratie in naam van de democratie, het afleiden van binnenlandse problemen, het toenemen van de wapenproductie, het uitzicht op het beheersen van olie- en drugsstromen in Afghanistan en omstreken. Gore: 'Wij zijn een natie van wetten en de presidentsverkiezingen van 2000 zijn voorbij'.
En ook al laat iedereen -de pers voorop- zich een rad voor ogen draaien door de huidige gespannen situatie: 'As recently as last week, according to the Gallup Organization, nearly half of Americans surveyed remain convinced that President Bush either “won on a technicality” or “stole the election.”'

Obama continues Bush's Iran policy

Also under President Obama Iran continues to dominate the world agenda. Iran is being presented as a crucial problem that must be solved. The Iran Problem is one with several layers. The uppermost layer is that Iran is a potential threat to world peace. What are the facts and the fiction that make up this first layer?

read more

WHO plays dubious role in Swine flu pandemic

On June 11, 2009 Margaret Chan, the Director-General of the WHO, declared the Swine Flu a pandemic. The declaration of phase six means that emergency procedures are put into motion which bypass established systems designed to safeguard the public health. The result of this is described in part six of this DeepJournal series on the Swine Flu. Conclusion: the vaccine is being tested while being administered to the public. The definition of what a pandemic is, is therefore of great import.

read more

Government flu advisors not independent

Ab Osterhaus is playing an important role in the affair surrounding the Swine Flu. Through his influence and conflicts of interest, he personifies a system that is now being subjected to investigation from all directions. Soon the investigators will undoubtedly stumble upon SAGE, the strategic advisory group of vaccine and immunity experts for the World Health Organization, or WHO. Osterhaus turns up here as well - he is an expert with SAGE.

read more

Influence of industry on 'fake pandemic' investigated

Also beyond The Netherlands the question is being raised over whether the large-scale acquisition of vaccines made sense. The Council of Europe began an investigation into this question last Tuesday. 'A number of members of the Council of Europe have expressed exceptionally harsh criticism of the World Health Organization and are asking themselves out loud whether drug manufacturers had too much influence in this decision'.

read more

How Dutch Minister Klink decided on vaccines with additives - 2

The Netherlands has an ongoing contract with Solvay Pharmaceuticals for the making of vaccines without additives. Then Dutch Health Minister Klink severs - with all of its accompanying financial consequences - the contract with Solvay. He signs new, secretive contracts with GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis, companies that make vaccines with additives - the so-called adjuvants. In The Netherlands everyone is receiving the same vaccine containing adjuvants - whether they are young or old, pregnant or not. What happened that caused Klink to make this decision?

read more